Sunset Residents Protest Proposed Car-Free Great Highway in San Francisco

Controversy is brewing in San Francisco's Sunset District over a proposal to make the Great Highway car-free permanently. While some residents and advocates support the idea, others are organizing a car caravan protest to voice their opposition. The issue has become a divisive topic in the community, with both sides passionately arguing their case.

Driving Change or Driving Away Drivers?

The Great Highway Debate

The Great Highway, a scenic coastal road in San Francisco, has been the subject of an ongoing debate over its future. During the COVID-19 pandemic, large portions of the highway were closed to vehicular traffic, allowing pedestrians and cyclists to enjoy the open space. However, this car-free arrangement has been a source of contention among Sunset residents.In 2021, the city enacted a compromise where cars were allowed back on weekdays, but the Great Highway remained car-free on weekends. This temporary solution was set to remain in place until 2025. Now, a November ballot measure sponsored by Supervisor Joel Engardio aims to make the car-free status permanent, seven days a week.

Sunset Residents Organize Car Caravan Protest

The proposed car-free Great Highway has sparked a strong backlash from some Sunset District merchants and residents. A group called "Open the Great Highway" is planning a Thursday morning "car rally" to protest the measure. The group is urging others to join them in voicing their opposition to the closure of the thoroughfare.The car caravan protest is set to begin with a 10 am gathering at the parking lot north of Lincoln Way and Great Highway, followed by speeches from unnamed speakers at 10:30 am. The car rally itself is scheduled to take place from 11:15 am to 12 noon, with the driving route to be announced on-site.

Conflicting Perspectives

Supporters of the car-free Great Highway, such as the group "Friends of the Great Highway Park," have criticized the planned car caravan protest. They argue that the caravan is "wasting gas creating the traffic that they claim to deplore," while the car-free measure is about "planning ahead for the future, creating a win-win for drivers and park lovers alike."On the other side, Sunset residents and community leaders have expressed strong opposition to Engardio's ballot measure. The Chinese American Democratic Club and Sunset branch of the Chinatown Merchants United Association of SF have both come out against the proposal. Neighborhood resident Patricia Arack told the SF Public Press that Engardio "did not say one word to a very significant number of people in his own district who are against it."

A Divisive Issue with Lasting Implications

The debate over the Great Highway's future is not just about the immediate impact on traffic and transportation. It also touches on broader issues of urban planning, environmental sustainability, and the needs of different community stakeholders.Proponents of the car-free measure argue that it aligns with the city's goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting active transportation. They envision the Great Highway as a vibrant public space that can be enjoyed by pedestrians, cyclists, and families.However, opponents are concerned about the potential impact on local businesses and the convenience of driving for Sunset residents. They argue that the car-free proposal was pushed through without adequate community engagement and input.As the November ballot measure approaches, the battle lines have been drawn, and the outcome will have lasting implications for the Sunset District and the city as a whole.